Citation

462 U.S. 324 (1982)

Decision : 9-0

Majority Opinion: Thurgood Marshall

Justices Participating

Categories

Cited Cases

  • 414 U.S. 661 (1973), ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK et al. v. COUNTY OF ONEIDA, NEW YORK, et al.
  • 433 U.S. 165 (1976), PUYALLUP TRIBE, INC., et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF GAME OF WASHINGTON et al.
  • 455 U.S. 130 (1981), MERRION et al., DBA MERRION & BAYLESS, et al. v. JICARILLA APACHE TRIBE et al.
  • 419 U.S. 544 (1974), UNITED STATES v. MAZURIE et al.
  • 448 U.S. 136 (1979), WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE et al. v. BRACKER et al.
  • 198 U.S. 371 (1904), UNITED STATES v. WINANS
  • 31 U.S. 515 (1832), SAMUEL A. WORCESTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA
  • 411 U.S. 164 (1972), MCCLANAHAN v. ARIZONA STATE TAX COMMISSION
  • 424 U.S. 382 (1975), FISHER v. DISTRICT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MONTANA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ROSEBUD
  • 411 U.S. 145 (1972), MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE v. JONES, COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF REVENUE OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
  • 380 U.S. 685 (1964), WARREN TRADING POST CO. v. ARIZONA TAX COMMISSION et al.
  • 425 U.S. 463 (1975), MOE, SHERIFF, et al. v. CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES OF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION et al.
  • 450 U.S. 544 (1980), MONTANA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
  • 435 U.S. 313 (1977), UNITED STATES v. WHEELER
  • 400 U.S. 423 (1970), KENNERLY et al. v. DISTRICT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MONTANA et al.
  • 417 U.S. 535 (1973), MORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al. v. MANCARI et al.
  • 391 U.S. 404 (1967), MENOMINEE TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES
  • 435 U.S. 191 (1977), OLIPHANT v. SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE et al.
  • 436 U.S. 49 (1977), SANTA CLARA PUEBLO et al. v. MARTINEZ et al.
  • 358 U.S. 217 (1958), WILLIAMS et ux. v. LEE, DOING BUSINESS AS GANADO TRADING POST
  • 439 U.S. 463 (1978), WASHINGTON et al. v. CONFEDERATED BANDS AND TRIBES OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION
  • 458 U.S. 832 (1981), RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC., et al. v. BUREAU OF REVENUE OF NEW MEXICO
  • 448 U.S. 160 (1979), CENTRAL MACHINERY CO. v. ARIZONA STATE TAX COMMISSION
  • 447 U.S. 134 (1979), WASHINGTON et al. v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION et al.
  • 118 U.S. 375 (1885), UNITED STATES v. KAGAMA & ANOTHER, INDIANS

Case Cited In

  • 463 U.S. 545 (1982), ARIZONA et al. v. SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE OF ARIZONA et al.
  • 463 U.S. 713 (1982), RICE, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA v. REHNER
  • 467 U.S. 138 (1983), THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE FORT BERTHOLD RESERVATION v. WOLD ENGINEERING, P. C., et al.
  • 471 U.S. 195 (1984), KERR-MCGEE CORP. v. NAVAJO TRIBE OF INDIANS et al.
  • 471 U.S. 845 (1984), NATIONAL FARMERS UNION INSURANCE COS. et al. v. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS et al.
  • 473 U.S. 753 (1984), OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE et al. v. KLAMATH INDIAN TRIBE
  • 476 U.S. 877 (1985), THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE FORT BERTHOLD RESERVATION v. WOLD ENGINEERING, P. C., et al.
  • 480 U.S. 202 (1986), CALIFORNIA et al. v. CABAZON BAND OF MISSION INDIANS et al.
  • 492 U.S. 408 (1988), PHILIP BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION et al.
  • 495 U.S. 676 (1989), DURO v. REINA, CHIEF OF POLICE, SALT RIVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, et al.
  • 502 U.S. 251 (1991), COUNTY OF YAKIMA, et al. v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION
  • 517 U.S. 44 (1995), SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. FLORIDA et al.
  • 526 U.S. 172 (1998), MINNESOTA, et al. v. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS et al.
  • 546 U.S. 95 (2005), JOAN WAGNON, SECRETARY, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION
  • 554 U.S. 316 (2007), PLAINS COMMERCE BANK v. LONG FAMILY LAND & CATTLE CO.