ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE et al. v. EGAN, GOVERNOR OF ALASKA

Charles Whittaker | voted with the majority or plurality
Earl Warren | voted with the majority or plurality
Felix Frankfurter | voted with the majority or plurality , justice wrote an opinion
Hugo Black | voted with the majority or plurality
John Harlan | voted with the majority or plurality
Potter Stewart | voted with the majority or plurality
Tom Clark | voted with the majority or plurality
William Brennan | voted with the majority or plurality
William Douglas | dissent , justice wrote an opinion

102 U.S. 145 (1879), LANGFORD v. MONTEITH
156 U.S. 347 (1894), MARICOPA AND PHOENIX RAILROAD COMPANY v. ARIZONA TERRITORY
72 U.S. 761 (1866), THE NEW YORK INDIANS
248 U.S. 78 (1918), ALASKA PACIFIC FISHERIES v. UNITED STATES
31 U.S. 515 (1832), SAMUEL A. WORCESTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA
109 U.S. 556 (1883), ex parte CROW DOG
116 U.S. 28 (1885), UTAH & NORTHERN RAILWAY v. FISHER
164 U.S. 240 (1896), DRAPER v. UNITED STATES
169 U.S. 264 (1897), THOMAS v. GAY.
241 U.S. 602 (1915), UNITED STATES v. QUIVER
163 U.S. 504 (1895), WARD v. RACE HORSE
326 U.S. 496 (1945), NEW YORK EX REL. RAY v. MARTIN, WARDEN
315 U.S. 681 (1941), TULEE v. STATE OF WASHINGTON
337 U.S. 86 (1948), HYNES, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, v. GRIMES PACKING CO. ET AL.
358 U.S. 217 (1958), WILLIAMS et ux. v. LEE, DOING BUSINESS AS GANADO TRADING POST
72 U.S. 737 (1866), THE KANSAS INDIANS: THE CASE OF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE
118 U.S. 375 (1885), UNITED STATES v. KAGAMA & ANOTHER, INDIANS
104 U.S. 621 (1881), UNITED STATES v. MCBRATNEY

380 U.S. 685 (1964), WARREN TRADING POST CO. v. ARIZONA TAX COMMISSION et al.
411 U.S. 145 (1972), MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE v. JONES, COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF REVENUE OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
411 U.S. 164 (1972), MCCLANAHAN v. ARIZONA STATE TAX COMMISSION
424 U.S. 382 (1975), FISHER v. DISTRICT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MONTANA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ROSEBUD
435 U.S. 191 (1977), OLIPHANT v. SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE et al.
447 U.S. 134 (1979), WASHINGTON et al. v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION et al.
448 U.S. 136 (1979), WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE et al. v. BRACKER et al.
450 U.S. 544 (1980), MONTANA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
463 U.S. 545 (1982), ARIZONA et al. v. SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE OF ARIZONA et al.
463 U.S. 713 (1982), RICE, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA v. REHNER
467 U.S. 138 (1983), THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE FORT BERTHOLD RESERVATION v. WOLD ENGINEERING, P. C., et al.
473 U.S. 753 (1984), OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE et al. v. KLAMATH INDIAN TRIBE
502 U.S. 251 (1991), COUNTY OF YAKIMA, et al. v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION
523 U.S. 751 (1997), KIOWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
533 U.S. 353 (2000), NEVADA, et al. v. FLOYD HICKS, et al.